Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1939No. 32,198PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Defendant was accused of having violated the zoning ordinance of the city of Minneapolis, in that on December 13, 1938, he did wilfully, wrongfully, and unlawfully use and occupy a building known as 102 South Cedar Lake Road for the handling and machine-cleaning of sacks and bags, said building being then and there within the light industrial zone, wherein such use is prohibited by said ordinance. Defendant was convicted and sentenced. He appeals from the judgment.

There are three assignments of error which defendant reduces to two, viz.: (a) The court erred in holding that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Freeman v. Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Howard v. Village of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Pearce v. Village of EdinaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. New Hanover County v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API