Legal Opinion

Harold D. Bookout and Betty Houser v. Linda Lou Beck and Daniel L. Beck, by Their Guardian Ad Litem, Edith P. Beck

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1965No. 20001_1PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

The district court’s final order refusing to vacate a judgment of appellees against appellants is reversed.

The Becks are citizens of California and Bookout and Houser are citizens of Indiana. They were involved in an automobile collision at Santa Rosa, New Mexico, in July, 1962. The Becks in September, 1962, elected to sue Bookout and Houser in the Northern District of California for their injuries. Diversity jurisdiction was pleaded. Initial “service” 1 on Bookout and Houser was ob tained by a deputy United States marshal in Indiana handing copies of the summons and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Wayne Wolfe v. Lucian Doucette and Rosemary DoucetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Meadows v. Dominican RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Vu v. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Arthur Rudick v. Melvin Laird, Secretary of Defense, and Stanley Resor, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. Bowers v. Board of Appeals of MarshfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Falkner v. AMERIFIRST FEDERAL SAV. AND LOANDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API