Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Watter v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed October 10, 1939:

Fritz, J.

The order appealed from was based upon facts alleged in the petition of the relator, Cortland Waiter, and the Industrial Commission’s return to an alternative writ of mandamus commanding the commission either tO' take jurisdiction or to show cause why it has not taken jurisdiction of an application for compensation filed by Waiter on April 12, 1937. It appears from Watter’s petition that as a result of an accident on October 1, 1929, while he was employed by the Ribbens Construction Company, he suffered, a temporary total disability…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Acme Body Works v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Miller v. LaingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Welhouse v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. A. D. Thomson Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rathjen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Sheehan v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Gallenberg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Andrzeczak v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Borum v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API