State v. Hals
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Alston, J., entered October 11, 1915, upon a trial and conviction of unlawful fishing.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The defendant Andrew P. Hals, was charged by information filed in the superior court for Snohomish county with the commission of a misdemeanor in that he “did unlawfully take and catch food fishes other than with hook and line,- to wit: — with a gill net, in the Stillaguamish river, a river flowing into Puget Sound.” His trial in the superior court resulted in conviction and judgment thereon, from which he has appealed to this court.
Appellant’s prosecution and conviction are rested upon the provisions of the fisheries code of 1915 reading as follows:
“It shall be unlawful, except with hook and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hess v. MuirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Cawsey v. BrickeyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. TiceWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Barker v. State Fish CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Phipps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Vail v. SeaborgWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- McMillan v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Irwin v. J. K. Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.