Legal Opinion

Zack Smith, III v. Marina Medina

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 22, 2012No. 11-11090, 11-30793UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Judge: * , **

This opinion consolidates two similar cases. Petitioners-Appellants Joyce Hickman (“Hickman”) and Zack Zembliest Smith (“Smith”) are both currently serving sentences in federal prison, and both were ordered to pay restitution. Each argued in a § 2241 habeas petition that the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) schedule governing their restitution payments via the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (“IFRP”) conflicts with the district courts’ sentencing instructions in their judgments. From the district courts’ judgments of dis missal, Hickman and Smith appealed. For…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jeffers v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. Harold E. McGhee v. J.J. Clark, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. HickmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. DiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wendel Wardell, Jr. v. Archie LongleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Okeayainneh v. MartinezDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2024
  3. Terrelonge v. OddoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API