Legal Opinion
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Runk
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided July 15, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Proceeding upon the judicial settlement of the accounts of an executor.
1Opinion of the Court
Dike, Acting Surrogate.
This controversy arises as to- the proper method to be pursued by the executor upon the final accounting herein, especially in computing the value of the life estate and with particular reference to the law of 1860 relating to charitable bequests.
William G. Taiman died in the county of Kings on November 9, 1900, leaving a last will and testament, which was duly admitted to probate; and letters testamentary thereunder were duly issued to Charles A. Runk who duly qualified. The testator left him surviving his wife, Frederika Talman, to whom he devised and bequeathed,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hollis v. . Drew Theological SeminaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- In re TeedNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- Rich v. TiffanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- McKeown v. OfficerNew York Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Executors of the Estate of BlumenthalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925
- In re the Estate of HarnedNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Estate of CropseyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939