Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Harned
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 14, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
Upon the settlement of the decree in this proceeding, an additional question is raised which was not presented at the time of the main argument and decision (138 Misc. 546). So far as pertinent, the facts affecting this additional point are as follows: Testator died on November 6, 1903, his will being admitted to probate in this court on February 8, 1904. On April 26, 1906, a decree was entered which directed the executors to hold, invest and keep invested, in accordance with the provisions of the will, the sum of $18,752.26, comprising the balance of the estate.
The testamentary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lupton v. LuptonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- In Re the Accounting of BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of RutherfurdNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Wheeler v. . RuthvenNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Bank of Niagara v. TalbotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Estate of AyvazianNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of TaftNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of MurdochNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Estate of TaftNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of GrubeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.