Legal Opinion

State v. Sneed

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1992No. 89-1291PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

Appellant has raised thirty-two propositions of law. Each has been thoroughly reviewed and, for the reasons stated below, we find all to be without merit, and uphold appellant’s convictions and death sentence.

I

In his first proposition of law, appellant argues that the trial court should have suppressed a handgun obtained by a warrantless search of his apartment. The handgun, a .25 caliber Raven-Arms automatic, was discovered in appellant’s apartment under the mattress of the bed he shared with Roxanne Goosby. Subsequent ballistic tests verified that this was the weapon used to kill Rowan.

The…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. GetsyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. HerringOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. HallerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API