State v. Webb
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
In this appeal defendant brings forward two assignments of error. Defendant asserts that during its instructions to the jury the trial court erred by failing to give him the benefit of certain evidence favorable to his defense. Defendant also maintains his constitutional right to due process was violated when the trial court considered, for purposes of sentencing, that the murder was committed while defendant was on pretrial release in an unrelated felony case. Neither argument affords defendant any relief.
The state’s evidence tends to show that on the evening of 24 October 1981…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. . FriddleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. PryorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- United States v. Cruz SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- State v. MacKCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.