Legal Opinion
Doyle v. Brock
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 4, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-0616PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Senior District Judge:
Section 402(b) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (“LMRDA” or “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 482(b) (1982), gives the Secretary of Labor authority to file civil actions challenging union elections already conducted “if he finds probable cause to believe that a violation of [the Act] has occurred and has not been remedied.” Section 403 makes that authority exclusive. 29 U.S.C. § 483.
Plaintiff Thomas Doyle protests the Secretary’s decision not to challenge and seek to overturn a June 1984 election held by Local 6 of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wirtz v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees Union, Local 6Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Local 3489, United Steelworkers of America v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas Doyle v. William Brock, Secretary, Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Brock v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- Doyle v. BrockDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Talley v. FeldmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Thomas Doyle v. William Brock, Secretary, Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987