Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Brock

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 2, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-0616PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Senior District Judge:

Under 29 U.S.C. § 482 (1982), the Secretary of Labor is authorized to sue in a federal district court on behalf of a union member to set aside an allegedly invalid union election. In this proceeding plaintiff Thomas Doyle sues the Secretary because of his refusal to bring an action against Local 6 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“Local 6” or “Union”) to overturn a union election held in June 1984. Ruling insufficient the Secretary’s initial statement of reasons 1 for that refusal, the Court remanded the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Wirtz v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees Union, Local 6Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Local 3489, United Steelworkers of America v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Charles E. Shelley v. William E. Brock, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. Balanoff v. DonovanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas Doyle v. William Brock, Secretary, Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. Thomas Doyle v. William Brock, Secretary, Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API