Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Haskins
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided November 28, 1988PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
This Court has before it, a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus from Carl J. Has- kins, Jr. (“Haskins”). In his petition, Has-kins requests this Court to compel the Superior Court to hear various pro se motions that he has filed. The State has filed an answer and a motion to dismiss Haskins’ petition.
Haskins is presently awaiting retrial in the Superior Court on two charges of first degree rape and one charge of attempted first degree rape. The Superior Court’s docket indicates that an attorney has been appointed to represent Haskins. No date has been set for Haskins’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Briscoe v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Snowden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Chavous v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Hall v. McGuiganSuperior Court of Delaware · 1999
- In Re BrookinsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.