Legal Opinion

Brown v. Beaver Valley Traction Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1928No. Appeal 786PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

For the purposes of this appeal the negligence of the defendant’s motorman must be conceded. The only question involved is the contributory negligence of plaintiffs ’' agent.

Plaintiffs conduct a garage and service station in the city of Beaver. They had been repairing an Overland touring car. After dark the owner came to take it away but could not start his car. Plaintiffs’ employe, Garvin, tried to crank it but could not. He then decided to try to start it by hooking it to a Winton truck, owned by plaintiffs and used as a service car, and towing it until the motor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. Federal Street & Pleasant Valley Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Fenner v. Wilkes-Barre & Wyoming Valley Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Mead v. Central Pennsylvania Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Hause v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Mortimer v. Beaver Valley Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pollock v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Rothberg v. Phila. R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Glassman v. P. R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. C. L. Lavine, Inc. v. Phila. R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Feinstein v. Philadelphia R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API