State v. Rowbotham
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Waite, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, David Rowbotham, entered a guilty plea to attempted kidnapping and attempted extortion. He now appeals his conviction on the grounds that his plea was not made knowingly and intelligently because the trial judge did not specifically mention one or more constitutional rights that were affected by his agreement. Appellant is correct, and the judgment is reversed.
{¶ 2} Appellant was indicted in Mahoning County on October 21, 2004. The indictment included three counts: attempted burglary, R.C. 2911.12(A)(2), a third-degree felony; attempted kidnapping, R.C.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. MadumeluOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. SeymourOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.