Hix v. Robertson
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILL VANCE, Justice.
The trial court ruled that a specified part of Hog Creek is a statutory navigable stream and that Appellees William and Lester Robertson and the general public are entitled to use its waters for fishing, boating, and recreational purposes. The trial court therefore enjoined Appellant William Hix from interfering with the Rob-ertsons’ access, use, and enjoyment of the waters on Hix’s land for those purposes. Asserting five issues, Hix appeals. 1 We will affirm.
Hog Creek runs through two tracts of land respectively owned by Hix and the Robertsons in Bosque and Coryell…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Martin v. AmermanTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Brown v. De La CruzTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Murray, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- in Re William Carroll Robertson and Lester Eugene Robertson, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2012
- Patrick Lee Mullins v. Hector Ortiz, Darrel Sutton, Robert Jenkins, Steven Rich, John Porter, and T. Roddey, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
- Peter and Camella Scamardo, FLP v. 3D Farms, a General Partnership, and Frank Destefano, Trustee, Sam F. Destefano Testamentary Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2018
- State of Iowa v. Jeffrey Alan MeyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.