Legal Opinion

Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. Willis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1884No. 10,968PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

— This was an action by the appellees against the appellant to recover damages for killing a mule by the appellant’s locomotive and cars,.between the switch at Car-lisle station and a bridge in Sullivan county, where the railroad was not securely fenced.

The appellant answered by a general denial, and also by a special paragraph, alleging that the injury complained of occurred near the town of Carlisle, at or near a point on the railroad track where it connects with a switch, used by the appellant for switching cars and trains of cars from and to the main track of the railroad; that it would…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. ChristyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. OestelIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. BeattyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. RowlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad v. HerboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Pearson v. Chicago, Burlington & Kansas City Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Gulp, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BlankenbecklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Acord v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KneadleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API