Legal Opinion

Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Oestel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1863PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.

1Per curiam

Suit by the appellee against the railroad company for killing a hog. The suit is based upon the statute making railroad companies liable for stock killed upon the road where it is not fenced. Judgment for the plaintiff.

We are of opinion that the defendant was not required to fence the road at the point where the animal in question was killed. It was at that point, near Indianapolis, where the engine house and machine shop, car house, wood house and wood yard, of the defendant are situated, which point, as it seems to us, could not well be fenced. Indianapolis, &c., R. R. Co. v. Kinney, 8 Ind.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. Wabash Railway Co. v. ForsheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. QuickIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. WillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API