Legal Opinion

Hooten v. Enriquez

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided November 10, 1993No. 08-93-00204-CVPublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARAJAS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final judgment granting declaratory and injunctive relief. Appellee, Hector Enriquez, the duly elected El Paso County Clerk, brought this action seeking to have the trial court declare the actions of Charles Hooten, Orlando Fonseca and Rogelio Sanchez, Appellants and El Paso County Commissioners, in amending Appel-lee’s budget to be illegal. In three points of error, Appellants challenge the declaratory judgment and injunction. We reverse and render in part and affirm in part the judgment of the trial court.

I. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE

The record…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Familias Unidas, an Unincorporated Association, and Irma Torrez v. Dolph BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Landry v. Travelers Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Dallas County, Texas v. MERSCORP, IncorporaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Jensen Construction Co. v. Dallas County, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  3. Griffin v. Birkman, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  4. Harris County v. Nagel, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  5. Welch v. State Ex Rel. Long, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1994

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API