Legal Opinion
Adler & Shaykin v. Wachner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 12, 1988No. 87 Civ. 6938 (JMW)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WALKER, District Judge:
Currently before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment made pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants defendant's motion. As a result, the Court need not address the Amended Counterclaims. 1
BACKGROUND
This case revolves around a series of agreements entered into by the parties: the plaintiff, Adler & Shaykin (“A & S”), a New York partnership between Frederick Adler and Leonard Shaykin that manages a leveraged buyout fund, the purpose of which is to acquire equity in a series…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Sabo v. DelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Lanzi v. BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pereira v. Centel Corp. (In Re Argo Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Berman v. ParcoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Independent Energy Corp. v. Trigen Energy Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Jesselson v. Outlet Associates of Williamsburg, Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. ANC Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.