Legal Opinion

Kuchins v. Hawes

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1990No. A048349PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SMITH, Acting P. J.

On November 10, 1986, plaintiff and appellant Diane Kuchins filed a complaint against defendants Paul Hawes, Pacific Bell (Pac Bell), and American Protective Services, Inc. (APS). Plaintiff did not serve the complaint on any named defendant until May 10, 1989, some two and one-half years later. The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s action for failure to serve the complaint on a timely basis, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 583.410 and 583.420.1

Plaintiff appeals, claiming the trial court abused its discretion in granting defendants Hawes’s and Pac Bell’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. County of San Diego v. Sanfax Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Salas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Lopez v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kuchins v. HawesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API