Legal Opinion

Gudmundsson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 11, 2011No. Docket 09-4869-cvPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHIN, Circuit Judge.

In 2000, plaintiffs-appellants Olafur Gudmundsson (“Gudmundsson”) and Sally Rudrud (together, “plaintiffs”) 1 jointly filed their 1999 federal tax return, reporting income earned on stock Gudmundsson received as compensation from his employer, Aurora Foods, Inc. (“Aurora”), on July 1, 1999. The stock was subject to several contractual and legal restrictions that impeded its marketability for one year — by which point the company’s stock value had plummeted. Plaintiffs sought to amend the tax return and obtain a refund, asserting that they had prematurely reported the stock…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Richard Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. And Peter StolzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Allianz Insurance Company v. Regina LernerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Francis BoccagnaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Mark Boyce v. Soundview Technology Group, Inc. (Formerly Known as Wit Capital Group, Inc.), Docket No. 05-1685-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. WylyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Dexia Real Estate Capital Markets, FKACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. Schroerlucke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Carter v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API