Legal Opinion

Lelasher v. Elm City Trucking Co.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 21, 1938No. File #52574Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcEVOY, J.

The evidence clearly shows that the plaintiff passed a “stop sign” as she entered the intersection when the collision occurred. In entering from the plaintiff’s left into this intersection the defendant operator was entitled to assume that the plaintiff would obey the direction of the stop sign and to govern his conduct accordingly. In this assumption he was disappointed. The plaintiff did not obey the stop sign. The claim under which the plaintiff attempts to justify her failure to stop at the indicated sign is that she did not see it, and that her vision of the sign was obstructed by a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Murphy v. WaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Hellman v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  4. Andrew v. White Bus Line CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Guhring v. GumpperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API