Legal Opinion

Curran v. Gordon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1912No. Docket No. 105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Alcona; Connine, J. Bill by Phillip Curran against John A. Gordon and others for an injunction restraining defendants from cutting certain timber. Prom an order overruling a demurrer to the complainants’ bill, defendant Gordon appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Complainant filed this bill to enjoin defendants from cutting certain standing timber in Alcona county. A temporary injunction was granted. Defendants demurred to the bill. Prom an order overruling the demurrer, the defendant Gordon has appealed.

The bill of complaint, in substance, shows: That on March 28, 1901, Sarah E. Backus was owner in fee of certain premises in Alcona county, and that on the foregoing date she sold him the timber thereon, and delivered to him the following bill of sale:

"Detroit, Mich., March 28, 1901.
"Por a valuable consideration I hereby sell to P. Cur-ran all the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nowlin Lumber Co. v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Greeley v. StilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Estelle v. PeacockMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. White v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCastle v. ScanlonMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Marshall v. HeselschwerdtMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Wade v. DayMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API