Legal Opinion

White v. King

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Otsego. (Kelley, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action of replevin, brought to recover a quantity of saw-logs cut from 40 acres of land owned by Edward S. La Sallé, of Portland, Mich., and located in the county of Otsego. The circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant. This was- error.

The plaintiff showed that she purchased the timber standing upon the land of one A. A. Crane. Crane testified that he sold the timber upon the authority of two letters received from La Salle, which letters are as follows:

“Portland, Mich., May 19, 1888.
“Cooper & Crane,
“ Gaylord, Mich.
“Dear Sirs: I have had several chances to sell a piece of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greeley v. StilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Welever v. Advance Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. McCastle v. ScanlonMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lord v. Detroit Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Curran v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Berry v. HaldemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API