Legal Opinion

Birmingham Electric Co. v. Harry

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1926No. 6 Div. 809PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In view of the importance of the question involved this court adopts the following as its finding of fact:

"The costs in the above-entitled cause having been heretofore taxed against the defendant therein, and the sum of $2, being designated as 'library tax,' which sum is hereinafter referred to as 'contested item,' having been taxed as a part of said costs, and the defendant having duly made and presented a motion to retax said costs by striking and eliminating said contested item from said costs as so taxed, and the county of Jefferson having requested and having been granted the right to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Mayor of Mobile v. Stonewall InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  3. State ex rel. Covington v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Board of Revenue v. HueySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. State v. Birmingham So. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Menz v. CoyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Marquardt v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. In Re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Melof v. JamesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API