State v. Pagel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendant was charged, under three separate indictments,① with first degree sexual abuse. ORS 163.425. The indictments allege that defendant subjected each of three different women to “sexual contact, by touching the breast * * *.”② Defendant’s demurrer to the indictments was sustained on the ground that ORS 163.425 is unconstitutionally vague. The state appeals.
The indictments were brought under ORS 163.425 (1) (b), which provides:
“(1) A person commits the crime of sexual *414abtíse in the first degree when he subjects another person to sexual contact; and
a* # # # #
“(b) The victim is subjected…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. SallingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- State v. WoodleyOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Klein v. Real Estate Commissioner HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.