In Re Weinshank
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CLAIMED EXEMPTIONS
PAUL G. HYMAN, Chief Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter came before the Court for evidentiary hearing on April 27, 2009, upon Deborah C. Menotte’s (“Trustee”) Objection to Claimed Exemptions (“Objection”), wherein the Trustee objected to David Ari Weinshank’s (the “Debtor”) claim that funds in his Washington Mutual bank account qualify for exemption as traceable earnings deposited into a financial institution pursuant to Florida Statutes § 222.11(2)(c) and (3).
FINDINGS OF FACT
The facts of this matter…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shotz v. City of Plantation, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- American Bankers Insurance Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re RamirezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2016