Legal Opinion

In Re Weinshank

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided May 28, 2009No. 08-25508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CLAIMED EXEMPTIONS

PAUL G. HYMAN, Chief Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court for evidentiary hearing on April 27, 2009, upon Deborah C. Menotte’s (“Trustee”) Objection to Claimed Exemptions (“Objection”), wherein the Trustee objected to David Ari Weinshank’s (the “Debtor”) claim that funds in his Washington Mutual bank account qualify for exemption as traceable earnings deposited into a financial institution pursuant to Florida Statutes § 222.11(2)(c) and (3).

FINDINGS OF FACT

The facts of this matter…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Shotz v. City of Plantation, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. American Bankers Insurance Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re RamirezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API