Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lowden v. State Corporation Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1938No. 4214Published

1Concurrence

I concur in the result reached by Mr. Justice BRICE, whose opinion will be hereinafter referred to as the main opinion. However, I prefer to rest my conclusion that the trustees are liable upon the fact that they are trustees of a public utility corporation, a railroad company, and, in carrying on the intrastate business of the corporation in New Mexico, necessarily exercise the corporate franchise for the privilege of doing which the tax in question is imposed.

A true distinction, recognized in the decisions, exists between the status of the receiver of the ordinary private business or…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. In Re KemmlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. California v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Michigan v. Michigan Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API