Legal Opinion

In re Cullinan

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Proceedings under the Liquor Tax Law to revoke and cancel a liquor tax certificate.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The petition in this case, supported as it is by the affidavits of Alfred Tanner and Duane B. Stillman, is sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon the court in this proceeding. It is undoubtedly true that jurisdiction is not conferred unless a petition is presented in which all the material facts are stated, and if, upon information and be*393lief, disclosing the source of the information or the grounds of the belief. Matter of Peck v. Cargill, 167 N. Y. 391. But the petition in this case clearly alleges the source of petitioner’s information, and the grounds of his. belief as to the material…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Peck v. . CargillNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. In re CullinanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. In re CullinanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. In re of CullinanNew York Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re JenningsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. In re CullinanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API