Legal Opinion

In re of Cullinan

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application to revoke a liquor tax certificate.

1Opinion of the CourtKenefick, J.

This application is based on a verified petition alleging upon information and belief certain violations of the Liquor Tax Law, and upon an affidavit containing positive averments of such violations.

Upon the return day of the order to show cause issued thereon, the certificate holder appeared by attorney and interposed the objection that the provision of subdivision 2, section 28, of the Liquor Tax Law, requiring him to file a verified answer tendering an issue and in default of such answer directing the revocation of his certificate, is unconstitutional and, therefore, void for the reason…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duryee v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. In re CullinanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Economus v. CoakleyNew York Supreme Court · 1920
  2. In re CullinanNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API