Legal Opinion

In re Cullinan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by Joe Kray from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 28th day of November, 1902, revoking and canceling a liquor tax certificate theretofore issued to him.

1Opinion of the Court

Hirsohberg, J.:

This proceeding was instituted by the State Commissioner of Excise by verified petition and an affidavit of the facts which was made a part of it, accompanied by an order requiring the appellant to show cause why his liquor tax certificate" should not be revoked, pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 28 of the Liquor Tax Law (Laws of 1896, chap. 112, as amd. by Laws of 1901, chap. 640). On the return day designated in the order to show cause, the appellant having objected to the jurisdiction of the court and having "also by objection raised the question that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. People Ex Rel. Taylor v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. The People v. . CourtneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Matter of Peck v. . CargillNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Matter of LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re JenningsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Bachmann-Bechtel Brewing Co. v. GehlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Oppenheim v. GuntherNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In re CullinanNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  5. In re ClementAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API