McCoy v. Drug Enforcement Administration
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976) against the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), Thomas Donnelly, a special agent of the DEA, the New York Police Department, and Michael Bramble, Gerald Kiernan and Robert Lamirata, employees of the New York Police Department, alleging that they violated his fourth and fifth amendment rights in that they unlawfully seized his BMW automobile (“BMW”). Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that the seizure of the BMW was unlawful, an injunction compelling its return and punitive…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Edgar Pauk v. The Board of Trustees of the City University of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Regan v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. One 1977 Lincoln Mark V, Serial No. 7Y89A832686District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chin v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987