Legal Opinion
Axel Johnson, Inc. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 19, 1993No. 89 Civ. 6490 (MEL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Third party defendants Industrial Tectonics, Inc. (“ITI”), ITI Holding Corporation, Helmut Stem, Robert A. Gockel, Frederick J. Malecki, and Jim Babcock, move to dismiss the third party complaint of defendant Arthur Andersen pursuant to Rule 9 and Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
I
ITI manufactures precision ball products and high performance bearings, particularly for defense, aerospace, and advanced commercial application. In December 1982, plaintiff Axel Johnson, Inc. bought all of ITI’s outstanding shares. In this action, Johnson asserts that two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. BernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Mas v. Two Bridges AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Musick, Peeler & Garrett v. Employers Ins. of WausauSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Government Guarantee Fund of the Republic of Finland v. Hyatt Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
- Gabriel Capital, L.P. v. NatWest Finance, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Mina Investment Holdings Ltd. v. LefkowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.