Legal Opinion
Mina Investment Holdings Ltd. v. Lefkowitz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 15, 1999No. 97 CIV. 1321(RWS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Nippon Credit' Trust Co. (“Nippon”) has moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6); Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss a claim against it for unjust enrichment brought by plaintiffs Mina Investment Holdings Ltd. (“Mina”) and Pentium Capital Holdings, Ltd. (“Pentium”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), on the ground that Plaintiffs have once again failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. For the reasons set forth below,, Nippon’s motion to dismiss the unjust enrichment claim contained in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is granted.
The Parties
Plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Cosmas v. HassettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Universal City Studios, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. And Nintendo of America, Inc., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- RSM PRODUCTION CORP. v. FridmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- CompuDyne Corp. v. ShaneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Regnante v. Securities & Exchange OfficialsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Rickel & Associates, Inc. v. Smith (In Re Rickel & Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Dragon Investment Co. II LLC v. ShanahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.