Legal Opinion

People v. Horton

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1963No. Crim. 1756PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONROE, J. pro tem., *

Defendant-appellant appeals from a conviction for felonious assault, as defined by Penal Code, section 245, prohibiting an assault “by any means of force likely to produce great bodily injury." The appellant assigns as his sole claim of error that his conviction was based upon the testimony of an accomplice, one Bernard James Walker, and that such testimony was not corroborated, as required by Penal Code, section 1111. That section provides:

“A conviction can not be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless it be corroborated by such other evidence as shall tend to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. LimaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. People v. ZankichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McKeehanIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. ChavezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. (HC) Caldwell v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API