People v. Duncan
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Luis Moya and Augustine Baldonado confessed to the police that they had killed Olga Duncan, the wife of defendant’s son Frank, and in their confessions stated that defendant had hired them to do the killing. The three were indicted for murder and tried separately. Defendant pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. The jury found her guilty of murder in the first degree and fixed the punishment at death. Pursuant to stipulation, the court sitting without a jury passed upon the sanity issue, and defendant was found to have been sane at the time of the commission of the offense.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Spies v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Hovey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. FauberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.