Legal Opinion

Metzger v. J. F. Brunken & Son, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1969No. File 10614PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIEGELMEIER, Presiding Judge.

From the record it appears defendant corporation entered into a contract with the City of Sioux Falls to construct a sewer line and subcontracted a portion of the work to one Fanebust as an independent contractor; that James Metzger, an employee of Fanebust, met his death August 8, 1966 while engaged within the course and scope of his employment in the performance of this subcontract. In this employment Fanebust and employee Metzger were covered by and subject to the South Dakota Workmen's Compensation Law being SDC 64 (herein referred to as Law), and in due…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Woolen v. Aerojet General CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. GLARRATANO v. Weitz CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Welker v. Kennecott Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HasvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Blumhardt v. HartungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Thompson v. MehlhaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ries v. Jm Custom Homes, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Mickelson v. Northern Plains Natural Gas Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API