Legal Opinion

Mazzola v. Commissioner of Transportation

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 8, 1978PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.

The defendant condemned for highway purposes 2.7 acres of the plaintiffs’ land on the northerly side of route 6 in the town of Windham and took easements to the slope and grade upon portions of the plaintiffs’ remaining land, thereby denying them of any right of access from the land directly onto the relocated route 6. The defendant assessed damages at $225,300 and filed a statement of compensation and a deposit for that amount with the clerk of the Superior Court. Thereafter, the plaintiff applied to the Superior Court for a review of the compensation and the court referred the matter to a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Amsel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  4. Budney v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Klein v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Minicucci v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Carol Management Corp. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. First Bethel Associates v. Town of BethelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API