Legal Opinion
United States v. Dohrmann
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 31, 2002No. 00-10440; D.C. No. CR-91-00673-FMSPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Bernhard Dohrmann appeals from the district court’s denial of his pro se Motion to Modify Original November 1995 Sentence to Time Served; Emergency Motion for Stay of Execution of Original Sentence; and Motion for Court Appointed Legal Counsel. He argues that the $1,034,000 restitution obligation imposed with his 1995 contempt conviction violates the rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because the facts upon which the district court based its restitution order were not proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Dohrmann…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Mark Brittingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- David John Miller v. Margaret Hambrick, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and William McCoy U.S. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Stephen Charles FORDE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Ernest Bernard Moore v. Janet Reno, Attorney General U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anderson v. FPC YanktonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
- Chaner v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Fishman v. GarlandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Hussain Kamal v. Grace Everson, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
- John Ways v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.