Legal Opinion

Stephen Charles FORDE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1997No. 97-55164PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The district court denied petitioner Stephen Charles Forde’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Forde filed a notice of appeal which the district court construed as a request for a certificate of appealability (COA). The district court denied the request for a COA and referred the request to this court.

We must decide whether 28 U.S.C. § 2253, as amended by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L.No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996), requires that Forde receive a COA before we may hear his appeal. The new section 2253(c)(1) provides the following:

Unless…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. Anthony Ojo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. Harrison v. OllisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Dock McNeely v. Lou BlanasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Kwok Chee Kwan, AKA Jeff KwanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. John Evangelist (Thomas) Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Close v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API