Stephen Charles FORDE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
The district court denied petitioner Stephen Charles Forde’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Forde filed a notice of appeal which the district court construed as a request for a certificate of appealability (COA). The district court denied the request for a COA and referred the request to this court.
We must decide whether 28 U.S.C. § 2253, as amended by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L.No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996), requires that Forde receive a COA before we may hear his appeal. The new section 2253(c)(1) provides the following:
Unless…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bradshaw v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Anthony Ojo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by137 opinions
- Harrison v. OllisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Dock McNeely v. Lou BlanasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Kwok Chee Kwan, AKA Jeff KwanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- John Evangelist (Thomas) Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Close v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.