Legal Opinion

Fishman v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 27, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2021-3049Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEVEN FISHMAN, : : Petitioner, : Civil Action No.: 21-3049 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 11, 15 : MERRICK B. GARLAND, : : Respondent. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner Steven Fishman, proceeding pro se, seeks a writ of coram nobis to vacate a portion of a sentence imposed on him for a criminal conviction in the Northern District of Oklahoma. 1 See Pet. Writ Coram Nobis (“Writ Petition”), ECF No. 1. After an issue effecting service,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API