Legal Opinion

Sieger v. Zak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated February 21, 2008, as granted, in part, that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to compel the production of specified documents claimed by the defendants to be confidential attorney-client communications.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs were the two minority shareholders, and the defendant Louis Zak was the majority…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Priest v. HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. OsorioNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nuss v. SabadDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
  2. In re Out-of-State Subpoenas Issued by the New York Counsel for State of California Franchise Tax BoardNew York Supreme Court · 2011
  3. William Tell Services, LLC v. Capital Financial Planning, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Charlestown Capital Advisors, LLC v. Acero Junction, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Fox Paine & Co., LLC v. Houston Cas. Co.New York Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API