Legal Opinion

William Tell Services, LLC v. Capital Financial Planning, LLC

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

George B. Ceresia, Jr., J.

The plaintiff William Tell Services, LLC (William Tell or plaintiff) and third-party defendant Joseph Ventura, the principal of William Tell, are securities brokers. Under applicable securities laws, in order to sell securities, a securities broker must be affiliated with a broker-dealer. As relevant here, until February 3, 2011, William Tell and Ventura were affiliated with an entity known as ING Financial Partners (ING Financial), a registered broker-dealer. This arrangement permitted plaintiff and Ventura to sell the financial products of ING *579Fi…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Priest v. HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. In Re Bieter CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacific Life Insurance Company v. Wells Fargo Bank, NADistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
  2. Schoenadel v. YouGov America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API