United States Et Al. v. Mississippi; And Henry Et Al. v. Mississippi
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
444 U.S. 1050
100 S.Ct. 994
62 L.Ed.2d 739
UNITED STATES et al.
v.
State of MISSISSIPPI. Aaron E. HENRY et al. v. State of MISSISSIPPI
No. 79-504
No.79-528
Supreme Court of the United States
February 19, 1980
The judgment is affirmed.
2Concurring in the judgmentJustice Stevens
1
In 1965, a three-judge District Court was convened in Mississippi to deal with allegations of malapportionment in Mississippi's State Legislature. By 1975, an acceptable reapportionment plan still had not been formulated; nevertheless, quadrennial elections were held under a court-ordered plan.1 In 1978, the Mississippi Legislature enacted a statutory reapportionment…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Beer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Connor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Connor Et Al. v. Waller, Governor of Mississippi, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Connor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.