Legal Opinion

United States Et Al. v. Mississippi; And Henry Et Al. v. Mississippi

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 19, 1980No. 79-504; 79-528Published

1Opinion of the Court

444 U.S. 1050

100 S.Ct. 994

62 L.Ed.2d 739

UNITED STATES et al.

v.

State of MISSISSIPPI. Aaron E. HENRY et al. v. State of MISSISSIPPI

No. 79-504

No.79-528

Supreme Court of the United States

February 19, 1980

The judgment is affirmed.

2Concurring in the judgmentJustice Stevens

1

In 1965, a three-judge District Court was convened in Mississippi to deal with allegations of malapportionment in Mississippi's State Legislature. By 1975, an acceptable reapportionment plan still had not been formulated; nevertheless, quadrennial elections were held under a court-ordered plan.1 In 1978, the Mississippi Legislature enacted a statutory reapportionment…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Beer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Connor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Connor Et Al. v. Waller, Governor of Mississippi, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Connor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API