Degruchy v. Xerox Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting defendant’s motion to renew its prior motion for summary judgment (see, Stewart v Taylor, 167 AD2d 846, lv denied 77 NY2d 805). Upon renewal, Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint because plaintiff was a special employee of defendant as a matter of law and his acceptance of workers’ compensation benefits as an employee of his general employer precluded him from bringing this personal injury action against defendant (see, Thompson…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Cameli v. Pace UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Richiusa v. Kahn Lumber & Millwork Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Lesanti v. Harmac Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Stewart v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ozzimo v. H.E.S., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Levine v. PontiacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Olsen v. We'll Manage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Alfonso v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Richmond v. BMC Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.