Legal Opinion

Richmond v. BMC Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memoran*1064dum: Supreme Court properly granted the cross motions of defendants and third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The record establishes that plaintiff was a special employee of defendant Buckbee-Mears as a matter of law (see, Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553, 557-558; Jeffords v Professional Bldrs./ Remodelers Group, 186 AD2d 989; Lesanti v Harmac Indus., 175 AD2d 664) and the acceptance by plaintiff of workers’ compensation benefits as an employee of his general employer precludes him from bringing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Lesanti v. Harmac Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Degruchy v. Xerox Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Jeffords v. Professional Builders/Remodelers Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API