Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Taylor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court correctly determined that a commercial vendor cannot be held liable under section 11-100 or 11-101 of the General Obligations Law absent proof that it sold alcoholic beverages directly to the alleged tort-feasor (General Obligations Law § 11-101; see also, Smith v Guli, 117 AD2d 1017; Lee v Holloway, 146 Misc 2d 455) or that it unlawfully furnished such beverages to an under-age person alleged to be the tort-feasor (General Obligations Law § 11-100).
The court did not abuse its discretion by entertaining…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sciascia v. NevinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Smith v. GuliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Lee v. HollowayNew York Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sherman v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Degruchy v. Xerox Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Rann v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Furio v. Palm Beach Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Haskell v. Chautauqua County Fireman's Fraternity, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.