Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Parsons
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 15, 1947No. Civil Actions Nos. 2297, 2348PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
Motions in the above-entitled cases pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to strike certain allegations from the complaint and answer were for convenience considered together in that the same law questions are involved.
These actions are brought by plaintiffs to recover overtime pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. Motions by the plaintiff Walter H. Peterson and by the defendant Federal Cartridge Corporation have raised two general issues in each case: (1) Is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Campbell v. HaverhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BrownellSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Pufahl v. Estate of ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Republic Pictures Corporation v. KapplerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fox Chemical Co. v. Amsoil, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1978
- H. KOHOUT v. Shakopee Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Buchholtz v. Swift & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
- Portlance v. Golden Valley State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Homewood Theatre, Inc. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.