Legal Opinion

Interest of G.L.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2018No. 20170406PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] D.L., mother of G.L., appeals from the juvenile court's order and judgment to continue guardianship of G.L. The mother argues the juvenile court erred in its determination of exceptional circumstances for continuing the guardianship. We reverse the order and judgment and remand.

I

[¶ 2] On July 27, 2015 the State filed a petition alleging G.L. (born in 2009) and her sister E.L. (born in 2001) were deprived. The parents, D.L. and T.S. (father), stipulated to a guardianship, placing both girls in the care of the eldest daughter, B.Y. The juvenile court entered an order…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Healy v. HealyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hoff v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hartleib v. SimesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Worden v. WordenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Wigginton v. WiggintonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Zakai F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  2. In the Matter of the Guardianship of Arb, a Minor Child: Harold Bumguardner and Stephanie Bumguardner v. Christina Houk F/N/A Christina ThonackWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Interest of D.M.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Interest of A.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. In re Zakai F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API