Legal Opinion

State v. Rouse

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 2004No. A-04-052PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cassel, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The State appeals from the district court’s order granting Roy J. Rouse’s motion to discharge because the 180-day time limit set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 to 29-3809 (Reissue 1995) (instate prisoner statutes) had expired. Because Rouse’s counsel implicitly requested a continuance while scheduling trial at Rouse’s arraignment, resulting in a delay that the trial court failed to recognize as an extension of the 180-day time limit, we reverse, and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

In March 2003, the district court for Hall County convicted Rouse of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. TuckerNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dennett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Burke Ex Rel. Burke v. McKayNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. EbertNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KolbjornsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. RobertsColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. WeichmanNebraska Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API